Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Should Trump be on ballot? Benson seeks ruling for ‘good of our democracy’

trump speaking into the microphone
(File photo)
  • Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson asks U.S. Supreme Court to decide ballot eligibility for Donald Trump
  • The former president is appealing a decision in Colorado, where justices voted to keep him off ballot for violating constitutional insurrection clause
  • Michigan Republicans argue voters should decide Trump’s political future, not courts or state election officials

LANSING — Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is asking the U.S. Supreme Court for a thorough and decisive ruling on whether Donald Trump is qualified to appear on presidential election ballots this year. 

With Colorado judges already deciding to keep Trump off the ballot in that state, a high court ruling “is necessary to avoid confusion and uncertainty in the election process,” attorneys for Benson wrote in a legal brief filed Thursday. 

Sponsor

Colorado justices last month ruled the former president violated an insurrection clause of the U.S. Constitution by encouraging Capitol riots in an attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden. 

Related:

Trump “incited and encouraged the use of violence and lawless action to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power,” and therefore is disqualified from returning to office under the 14th Amendment, the Colorado court ruled

Trump appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, where a potential ruling could have major implications for Michigan and other states as Trump leads polls of the GOP presidential field, setting up a potential rematch with Biden this fall. 

The former president will be on the ballot for Michigan’s Feb. 27 primary after the state Supreme Court last month rejected a lawsuit similar to Colorado’s. Clerks have already begun sending voters absentee ballots that include Trump’s name.

But Michigan justices did not weigh in on the merits – whether Trump committed insurrection – and plaintiffs said they may renew their legal challenge to try and keep Trump off the general election ballot should he win the GOP nomination.

“In other words, the State of Michigan and Secretary Benson could still be the targets of renewed efforts to disqualify the former president,” attorneys for Benson said Thursday in the U.S. Supreme Court filing.

As such, "full and complete resolution” of arguments over the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution “is necessary to avoid confusion and uncertainty in the election process,” Benson’s attorneys continued. 

Benson, a Democrat who is the state’s top election officer, “takes no position in this brief as to how these legal issues should be resolved, but for the good of our democracy, the Court should resolve them now,” lawyers said on her behalf.

Trump too is asking the nation’s highest court to weigh in. His attorneys on Thursday urged justices – including three he appointed as president – to “put a swift and decisive end” to lawsuits arguing he is ineligible to serve.

The ballot-disqualification efforts “threaten to disenfranchise tens of millions of Americans” and “promise to unleash chaos and bedlam if other state courts and state officials follow Colorado’s lead,” Trump’s attorneys wrote in a filing. 

Sponsor

In separate filings, Republican officials across the country agreed. And so did Peter Meijer, a former Congressman who voted to impeach Trump over the Jan. 6 riots and is now running in the Michigan GOP primary for U.S. Senate.

The decision to keep Trump off Colorado ballots was “an affront to the very democracy it purports to protect,” attorneys for Meijer wrote. “The United States Constitution and democratic process should prioritize the will of the voters — not judges and partisan Secretaries of State.”

All six Michigan Republicans currently serving in Congress also weighed in. They joined a pro-Trump legal brief spearheaded by U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana. 

Only Congress can decide how to enforce the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause, attorneys for the lawmakers wrote, and it is "critical" the nations' highest court "minimize the partisan incentive to boot opponents off the ballot.”

How impactful was this article for you?

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now